AI Detector for Teachers

Suppose a student writes «انخفض استهلاك المياه في المدرسة خلال الصيف». Ask which school records support the claim that water use fell over the summer. Compare the figures with the student’s earlier draft and discuss how they wrote the sentence. Apply your institution’s AI-use policy. Do not assign a penalty based on a detector result alone.

No. Check the original Arabic text directly. The English interface is separate from the language of the document, and translating first would change the text being assessed.

Results depend on the text, its length, topic and editing. Consult the accuracy page for Arabic benchmark details. Multilingual benchmark figures are not an accuracy guarantee for an individual Arabic document.

Treat mixed-language results with extra care. Review passages in context and, where useful, inspect substantial Arabic and English sections separately. Short fragments may not give enough context for a useful assessment.

Use the free allowance currently shown in the app to try a scan. Check the current plans for document limits, batch uploads, reports and API access.

Paste the original Arabic assignment or upload a supported file, then run the scan. Use Deep Scan to inspect individual sentences. Compare the result with sources and drafts, and discuss unclear passages with the student.

Yes, batch upload lets you review multiple documents in one workflow. Check the current plan for batch, word and file-size limits, then review each assignment on its own merits.

No. AI detection estimates whether wording may be AI-generated; plagiarism checking looks for matches with other sources. Review citations and quotations separately from the AI result.

Canvas LMS integration supports submission checks inside SpeedGrader. Moodle is currently marked as coming soon. Use the API for custom workflows and confirm institutional requirements before implementation.

Use the report export options available in your plan. Include the relevant passage, assignment context and your follow-up questions. The report documents a scan result and should not be presented as proof of cheating.